Alert
Alert
Alert

Protesting using conventional communication

cdudgeon@nsseo.org

3/30/2017 8:21 PM

I have a student who currently uses unconventional communication to protest and refuse/reject. He will vocalize, throw or push items, or turn his body away to indicate that he does not want or like something. During highly structured activities and when provided with aided language stimulation (modeling using AAC), he can also use conventional communication and/or concrete symbols (using his AAC device) to protest. However, he does not generalize these skills to unstructured activities or times when he is dysregulated or upset. Any suggestions for how to generalize the use of concrete symbols to protest or refuse/reject? Thank you!

Refuse,Protests,Refuses/Rejects,Level 5. Concrete Symbols,Please Help!,Intervention Strategies

This post is part of the collection

  • Like this post1 likes
  • 2 replies

I think one of the things I like best about the Communication Matrix is how it breaks expressive communication into recognizable layers of competence, while also recognizing that these layers are fluid. Just because we reach one level of competence in some situations, it does not mean we never resort to previous forms of communication. Although I am able to communicate with language most of the time, when I don't feel well, or I am stressed, I might communicate in a less formal manner. The same is true for for my 20 year old son Dylan. His ability to communicate at one level or another shifts depending on how he is feeling, the environment he is in, the supports around him, and even if the level of expectation is matched to his ability in the moment. Over the past year, he has moved into using formal language for refusal. That is, he can "say, No!" He's got the sign, the concept, and even the ability to adjust the intensity of his sign, depending on how strongly he feels about the refusal. Yet, there are other times, we still get the growl, or the pushing away, or even curling into a ball to express refusal. I have come to believe that in these states, he is most likely to be experiencing pain or stress, that reduces his ability to communicate at the language level. In the same way, I would not want someone pressing me, when I don't feel up to "language", I do not demand "language" from Dylan in these situations, recognizing that either one of us would likely just express a stronger refusal at an informal layer, with what some might call a behavior. I feel respecting what he is saying, must come before demanding a higher level of expression. With that respect, comes the opportunity for further communication exchanges.

Kimberly Lauger - 4/11/2017

Wonderful insight, mom!!!!I am an SLP, and feel it is important to consider how naturally developing people think and act and connect to out therapy. For example, I am able to appropriately communicate no, wait, stop, etc.- however, when I am internally irritated or frustrated/stressed about something in my life/at that moment, my ability to appropriately communicate no wait, stop, etc. can change (into a less controlled manner).

Additionally, something to think about for the one that posted the questions....language is very taxing and exhausting for some of our students. My students know when and/or with who they can get away with a lazier form of communication, or/and, that the expectation in some situations have not been as high compared to other situations/with certain people. With that, it sounds like your student's communication would befit from a a behavior intervention plan that addresses inappropriate communication.

fkriegs - 4/12/2017

Wonderful insight, mom!!!!I am an SLP, and feel it is important to consider how naturally developing people think and act and connect to out therapy. For example, I am able to appropriately communicate no, wait, stop, etc.- however, when I am internally irritated or frustrated/stressed about something in my life/at that moment, my ability to appropriately communicate no wait, stop, etc. can change (into a less controlled manner).

Additionally, something to think about for the one that posted the questions....language is very taxing and exhausting for some of our students. My students know when and/or with who they can get away with a lazier form of communication, or/and, that the expectation in some situations have not been as high compared to other situations/with certain people. With that, it sounds like your student's communication would befit from a a behavior intervention plan that addresses inappropriate communication.

fkriegs - 4/12/2017

  • Like this post0 likes
  • 0 replies

What a great question! Of course, it raises some further questions:

Are you sure that this student understands the meaning of his "no" (protest) symbol? That's a very abstract concept, so we would want o be very sure that he only uses it in appropriate circumstances, suggesting that he understands its meaning.

2. Is the symbol always available to him?

If the answer is yes for both questions, then perhaps there are some situations where it is safe to ignore an inappropriate protest and not respond until he uses the symbol (or a conventional pre-symbolic means of protesting), at which point you would immediately remove the undesired item or take him away from the undesired activity. If there aren't safe situations that happen naturally, then perhaps you could set up several situations a day where you purposefully give him something he doesn't like, and you are available to shape an appropriate protest response form him.

What ideas do other people have?



Communication Matrix Team - 3/31/2017

The Communication Matrix is a service of Design to Learn at Oregon Health & Science University
© 2025 Charity Rowland, Ph.D.

Site by State33 and Smith & Connors